A study because of the Pether (1968) advised that one or two good differences take place in the fresh entering of around 20% out-of sets of relevant countries at RTD x a lot of
In the parenthesis:lysis in the RTD x one hundred. Interpretation: Cultures step one-cuatro indistinguishable out of each other: societies 5, six and you may eight distinguishable regarding societies step one-cuatro and you will out of both.
tests on one community exhibited smaller adaptation than testing for the e culture; and these in their change demonstrated faster adaptation than simply successive societies separated about exact same pure supply, otherwise off other however, epidemiologically related source. But when sets of cultures considered to be from preferred resource was basically most of the checked out at RTD using one big date, lower than 5% differed from the multiple strong reaction. In the event that,which have 2 or more phages, you will find an excellent + + response that have one society with no lysis of the other, there is certainly an effective expectation your a couple countries just weren't related. It “several strong distinctions” code has been generally acknowledged just like the techniques having interpreting the newest outcome of entering in the RTD (Blair and Williams, 1961). The utilization of which code was represented for the Desk 111. Countries no. 1-cuatro might be felt indistinguishable, because the within the zero circumstances do that tell you a few solid differences off another; despite differences in the potency of reactions, nos step one,dos and step three inform you zero good differences; no. 4 shows one solid distinction off nos 1 and 2 (phage 77), but zero strong improvement from zero. 3. Cultures no, 5 and you can six differ because of the a couple of strong reactions out-of nos 1-4; no. 5 have a couple of solid responses (having phages 53 and you may 83A) not shown by the nos 1 - 4 ; zero. 6 gets an effective reaction having phage 47 however, does not have the new impulse with phage 6.